So, M. Canton and others have asked me to answer some questions pertaining to hyperflexion and nuchal ligaments, etc., two words which, in over 35 years of training, I’ve never used. Never!
But, I promised I would do my best to answer all fair questions, and so I will try, and I hope that readers will, at the very least, respect the effort and keep an open mind to my answers. Above all, I hope you all know that I truly love all animals, especially horses and dogs, and I would never do anything knowingly to hurt any of them. On to the questions.
The first one asks if I think that hyperflexion gains access to the horses back and puts them on their hindquarters. As I said before, I have never used what I believe people today are referring to as hyperflexion. I also have never seen the videos discussed in question 4, so I can’t judge them. Here is what I can and will say.
I believe that every horse should be treated as an individual, with thier physical and psychological needs being considered as unique to themselves and their training. Just like a person, their conformation as well as their personality predisposes them to reacting in particular ways, and the trainer’s responsibility is to key into these characteristics and adjust to them so as to produce the greatest possible results with the least amount of effort from both horse and rider. The low-backed, high necked horse may gain great benefits by being put deep in its frame, though this should still never be asked for by pulling their head down with force, but rather through the harmonious use of legs, seat, and reins in such a way that causes them to seek the ground and a lower, longer frame. The consequent stretching down does result in the back growing upward under the rider’s seat which brings the bridge of the back into a better place to carry the weight. To prove this theory to yourself, it takes only to look at the value of child’s pose or cat, and others like it in yoga. As the head and neck are lowered with the chin in, and the back is raised and rounded while the buttocks are lowered under the body, the restorative properties of this strech are manifested immediately. We do this in yoga in a soft and flowing way and never under stress or by force, and this should apply for the good of the horse as well. Please remember this last line, OK? By contrast, horses which are built very downhill and front-end loaded may be better off being ridden to a higher frame which keeps them off their forehand for a greater proportion of their ride. The horse tells the knowlegible trainer what it needs- and they listen!
Question 2 asks, basically, if I think that horses are being well trained and ridden in competition today - if they are correctly connected, supple, and showing good piaffe and extentions.
I feel like the guy on a sitcom whose wife has asked him a trick question, waiting for him to give the wrong answer and say, “Ah ha!”. It makes me want to run the other directiion, just as I’ve watched Tim on Home Improvement do on so many re-runs. But I will still try to answer.
I think that there is more good riding today on good horses in general than there was 30 years ago. There is also more bad riding on bad horses. There’s just way more of everything, and way more access to seeing it all in one’s home office. Take a look at books from the 30’s and 40’s, or even the 70’s, and you will see that a great number of the horses were extremely stiff and not even approaching what we today term as “through” or “on the bit”. In 1984, at my first Olympics, relatively few horses could actually perform all the movements in the Grand Prix at all, and the individual bronze medal was won with a 66%! What I am saying is that we have bred far more athletic horses in the last 25 years, and riders and trainers from around the world have likewise become far more sofisticated with regard to the selection of those animals appropriate for the international arena. Sadly, part of this equation has been the incredible rise in cost of these horses, some more expensive then our homes! These amazing equines are more refined than most from decades before, are hotter and more sensetive, and generally lighter to all aids. Do they use their backs more or less than in the past, extend with greater or lesser overstride, and piaffe with lower haunches? It completely depends on the horse, just like it always did. The great geniuses, both equine and human, that we mortals regard with awe, always have and always will out themselves from the masses, just as all the true artists of every age have. In my time, Granat, Allerich, Marzog, Rembrandt, Bonfire, Salinero, and yes, Kennedy, are just some of the amazing equines I feel honored to have known, along with their riders. Likewise, Schultheis, Rehbein, Klimke, Werte, and yes, Van Gruensven are among my notable “greats”. If, during their careers, they have had moments they, like I, wish hadn’t happened, because the horse’s best interest was not put above their own, I hope you, like I, will foregive them. Sorry if you can’t accept that.
I will once again remind you all that I LOVE horses and that I am totally against anything that produces unfair pain or bewilderment to them at any time. I welcome anyone to come anytime and watch me ride my horses, though only for hobby these days, or even better, come to one of my symposia as I travel the world on my farewell “Cher” tour. Come sit, ask questions, watch the horses and riders work, take part and have fun- and then go home and get back on your laptops and discuss what you’ve seen. I will try very hard as I always have to give you reason to be proud of me.
Cheers!
RD