It was a very long day of testing various methods of judging and scoring dressage, beginning at 9:00am for us, the FEI Task Force members and ending at 10:00pm. Thanks to the many riders who have volunteered to come and show in their full dress, despite the extremely hot and sunny weather (which I kept thanking GOD for!), as well as the judges and everyone from Aachen who are doing so much to make everyone feel welcome, as usual. It never ceases to thrill me to walk onto these show grounds, even when there seems to be only us very few fanatics instead of the 65,000 normally in attendance for a real show. There is truly no place that compares to Aachen!
The first test was devised by David Strickland and Wayne Channon and concerned separating the judging tasks into each only scoring 1 or 2 main parts of the training scale throughout the Grand Prix. 7 judges judged; the first scored Impulsion; the second, Rhythm; the third, Contact and Suppleness; the fourth, Precision;, the fifth, Submission; the sixth, Collection; and the seventh, Straightness. Once again, the results of this test will require some time before we can ascertain whether or not this method shows promise.
The second trial consisted of a comparison between 5 judges judging, 7 judges judging with all scores counting, and 7 judges judging with the high and low scores dropped out. Analysis of this trial will require a couple of days before we receive the data to determine what, if any, value might arrive from either change.
The third trial used a total of 10 judges, 5 who judged as normal and 5 who judged using .5 points. the logic behind using 1/2 points is that many times a judge would like to give a “big 7″ or a “little 8″ but they may not and they therefore stick to the rounded score. In many cases, being able to give the extra .5 would change a final score by several percentage points and therefore alter the placements of that competitor. Marabel Alonso, sitting at C, discussed her feeling with the audience saying that, although at the beginning it was a bit disconcerting to have to ‘think differently”, by the end she began to feel more comfortable with this method and could imagine judges getting used to giving half points and it becoming not a problem.
This took us to the dinner hour, after which Katrina Wuest first did a magnificent job of explaining, along with a wonderful presentation, how future judging of Dressage may work with dividing the tasks while using new formulas and technology to enable judging to truly move into the 21st century. It will require more time to work out the kinks and secure the software necessary for it to work, but shows amazing promise and the obvious countless hours of work she put into this. Katrina then used video of rides from the European Championships in Turin, Italy, to show how, using test sheets which she created and the Task force approved, judges could separate the technical from the artistic tasks, some only doing the one while others only do the other. The most positive thing about this is that those judges doing the artistic judging could, for the very first time, sit back and have the luxury of simply watching the entire test before giving marks for that part of the performance. With as many as 25 I and O judges in attendance, there was much very good discourse and tomorrow we will try this method using live horses and riders and see how it goes.
I will certainly report back tomorrow evening with all the news from the day. And now this jet-lagged lover of Dressage is going to sleep!
Cheers!
RD