It’s that time again for me to tell it like I see it, which I feel pretty sure is going to land me in trouble with at least some of my readers, as it usually does. Of course most of the time I would not know I was actually in trouble since those who are angry at me tend to vent their thoughts on those other websites. :) Like I said many times, I’m totally happy to discuss most anything on my site, provided I know the name of the person I’m debating. So please, if you feel provoked by what I’m about to say, let me know how you feel. Perhaps we can actually learn something from each-other.
So here’s the thing. My friend, Astrid, from Eurodressage.com asked me to give my opinion regarding the new rules pertaining to the limited use of NSAID’s such as bute and aspirin in regulated doses. She wondered if both human athletes who become sore, or equine athletes having the same symptoms are not simply the result of being pushed beyond what is reasonable, Possibly both 2 and 4 legged athletes in this scenario would be better off being put quietly out to pasture?
Interestingly, when I reflected upon her questions before giving my answers, it brought me back to the 1970’s when there was a big fight going on between trainers as to whether leg-yielding should be a movement or just an exercise and included in lower level dressage tests or not. Let me tell you, this debate became red hot as the press took hold of it and found those on both sides, some saying that only a shoulder-in done on 3 tracks is classical and all other variations is nothing more than circus. And me? I found the entire discussion laughable. How absurd to have people fighting over whether teaching horses to yield away from the leg, are doing so with good or ill intent.
What I have decided over my many years listening to horse people fighting over things like whether a canter pirouette is done in a 3 or 4 beat canter or if a piaffe is actually not done in a true trot, or if giving a horse a low dose of aspirin is against the welfare of the animal, is that most often the loudest people in the fight are the ones who simply have too much time on their hands and the least understanding of this or pretty much any sport for that matter.
I’ll tell you what I think. Leg yielding went on to be put in lower level tests and no horses that I know of had their careers end because of it. Every movement in the canter should be done in one of 3 beats, even if that seems almost impossible to achieve, and the same goes for the piaffe being ridden in a true trot. It does no service to anyone to think and train otherwise, so keep those pirouettes in a true gallop if you can and the piaffes bouncing from diagonal to diagonal if there is any way to do so. For then you can know that you are doing your best to achieve the perfect goal, as opposed to changing what you believe to accommodate for a thought more mediocre. The trainer who thinks like a horse clearly understands that the piaffe should not be divorced in the animals mind from the trot and that holds true of the pirouette within the canter.
And now to the new drug rules. Ask any athlete at the top of their game in any sport, in or out of the Olympic family, if they have used anti-inflammatory drugs during their lives for training and competition. You are going to hear a resounding YES! It just goes without saying that to achieve the very best performance requires the exertion of muscles on a daily basis, and this has the affect of making us, on occasion, sore. Did you ever hear the saying, “NO PAIN - NO GAIN”? This is a truism on many levels. Muscular development is a result of inflamation which produces added scar tissue and layer by layer, the build up of this tissue becomes the weightlifter’s biceps, the runner’s legs, and the dressage horse’s beautiful physique. But inflammation is felt in the athlete, human or equine, as soreness. Now, this is different from a true injury which, even with low doses of NSAID’s, cannot be masked and should not be, but rather should force one to deal with their or their animal’s infirmity by stopping competing and doing all that is necessary to completely heal the issue. But the soreness which is just part of the everyday life of the athlete is dealt with by a combination of ice, heat, massage, and yes, anti-inflammatory drugs. Every human athlete at the Olympics knows exactly what is and is not allowed, and understands very well the difference between performance enhancing drugs and those legal and used wisely to take out inflammation that comes with the territory on a daily basis. Do you think Carl Lewis or Edwin Moses got through all those games and achieved such greatness along with longevity from having a zero tolerance for every drug including those now allowed for horses? It would be absurd to even consider it. Provided we respect the rules and live by the letter of the law, I guarantee you, just like with leg-yielding, 30 years from now someone is going to write about the time people were actually fighting over whether it was acceptable to give low dose aspirin to horses in competition, and say that only good came from it. And I hope that, because of my always taking one baby aspirin a day for my adult life, it will be me that writes that article too!
Cheers!
RD